翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Boardman House (Saugus, Massachusetts) ・ Boardman Ice Zone ・ Boardman Lake (Idaho) ・ Boardman Lake Trail ・ Boardman Neighborhood Historic District ・ Boardman Peak ・ Boardman River ・ Boardman River Nature Center ・ Boardman River Trail ・ Boardman Robinson ・ Boardman Tasker Prize for Mountain Literature ・ Boardman Township ・ Boardman Township, Clayton County, Iowa ・ Boardman Township, Mahoning County, Ohio ・ Boardman Township, Michigan ・ Boardman v Phipps ・ Boardman's Windmill ・ Boardman, Florida ・ Boardman, North Carolina ・ Boardman, Ohio ・ Boardman, Oregon ・ Boardman, Wisconsin ・ Boardman–Mitchell House ・ Boardmasters Festival ・ Boardroom coup ・ Boardroom, Inc. ・ Boards (magazine) ・ Boards of Canada ・ Boards of Canada discography ・ Boards of Cooperative Educational Services Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Boardman v Phipps ： ウィキペディア英語版 Boardman v Phipps ''Boardman v Phipps'' () (UKHL 2 ) is a landmark English trusts law case concerning the duty of loyalty and the duty to avoid conflicts of interest. ==Facts== Mr Tom Boardman was the solicitor of a family trust.〔See the case report at () 2 AC 46〕 The trust assets include a 27% holding in a company (a textile company with factories in Coventry, Nuneaton and in Australia through a subsidiary). Boardman was concerned about the accounts of the company, and thought that to protect the trust a majority shareholding is required. He and a beneficiary, Tom Phipps, went to a shareholders' general meeting of the company. They realised together that they could turn the company around. They suggested to a trustee (Mr Fox) that it would be desirable to acquire a majority shareholding, but Fox said it was completely out of the question for the trustees to do so. With the knowledge of the trustees, Boardman and Phipps decided to purchase the shares themselves. They bought a majority stake. But they did not obtain the fully informed consent of all the beneficiaries. By capitalizing some of the assets, the company made a distribution of capital without reducing the values of the shares. The trust benefited by this distribution £47,000, while Boardman and Phipps made £75,000. But then John Phipps, another beneficiary, sued for their profits, alleging a conflict of interest. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Boardman v Phipps」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.